NAHB, Housing, Consumer Advocacy and Banking Groups Oppose Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Action to Raise Refinancing Costs

By Industry News

In a move strongly opposed by NAHB, housing, consumer advocacy and banking groups, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac announced they will charge a 0.5% fee on refinance mortgages they purchase as of Sept. 1.

NAHB believes this action was ill-conceived and could not have come at a worse time. Housing has been keeping the economy afloat during the coronavirus pandemic, so it makes absolutely no sense for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase financing costs for mortgage borrowers during an economic crisis.

This move, approved by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), will hurt families trying to make ends meet in these challenging times and goes against President Trump’s recent executive action calling on federal agencies to do all they can to help renters and home owners to weather the economic effects of this pandemic.

Joint Statement in Opposition

NAHB joined with 19 other housing and banking organizations — including the American Bankers Association, Center for Responsible Lending, Mortgage Bankers Association and National Association of Realtors — to issue the following joint statement in opposition:

“Wednesday night’s surprise announcement by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the GSEs) conflicts with the Administration’s recent executive actions urging federal agencies to take all measures within their authority to support struggling homeowners. The additional 0.5% fee on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refinance mortgages will raise costs for families trying to make ends meet in these challenging times. In addition, the September 1 effective date means that thousands of borrowers who did not lock in their rates could face unanticipated cost increases just days from closing.

“In spite of the fragility of the national economic recovery, the mortgage market has been able to withstand many of the most severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recent refinance activity has not only helped homeowners lower their monthly payments, but it is also reducing risk to the GSEs and taxpayers. At a time when the Federal Reserve is purchasing $40 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities per month to help reduce the cost of buying or refinancing a home and stimulate the broader economy, this action by the GSEs raises those costs, contradicting and undermining Fed policy.

“The pricing increase is particularly harmful for our nation’s low- and moderate-income homeowners and for the emerging, but unsteady improvements to the national economy. The undersigned organizations strongly urge the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which had to approve this policy, to withdraw this ill-timed, misguided directive.”

Again, Credit for Builders Tightens While Rates Decline

By Housing

Builders and developers responding to NAHB’s survey on financing for Acquisition, Development and Construction (AD&C) indicated that credit continued to become tighter in the second quarter of 2020.   The net tightening index derived from the survey came in at 12.0, after reaching an 8 1/2-year high of 22.7 in the first quarter. The index is constructed so that positive  numbers indicate tightening of AD&C credit, negative numbers easing.  The first quarter of 2020 marked the  first time NAHB members had reported positive net tightening since 2012.  Meanwhile, a similar index from the Federal Reserve’s survey of senior loan officers also indicated net tightening of credit in the second quarter—and to a much greater extent than the NAHB survey.  The Fed index jumped by more than 28 points, to a positive 80.9.

The top ways in which lenders were tightening credit during the second quarter, according to the builders and developers who reported tightening, were lenders simply ‘not making new loans’ and lenders ‘pulling back because of coronavirus concerns’ (each cited by 52 percent of respondents), followed by lenders ‘lowering their LTV or LTC ratios’ (48 percent) and ‘reducing the amount they are willing to lend’ (41 percent).

Reversing a downward trend from the previous quarter, larger shares of builders and developers reported seeking AD&C loans in the second quarter of 2020.  The share increased from 22 to 31 percent of respondents seeking credit for land acquisition, from 20 to 29 percent of respondents seeking credit for land development, and from 45 to 52 percent of respondents seeking credit for any type of single-family construction.  Despite the rebound, all these percentages remained lower than they were at the end of 2019.  It is tempting to blame the reduced loan-seeking behavior on the coronavirus, although relatively few builders or developers specifically cited the virus as a motivating factor when given the chance.

Also in the second quarter of  2020, builders and developers reported declining interest rates on all types of AD&C loans covered in the NAHB survey.  The average effective rate (based on  rate of return to the lender over the assumed life of the loan taking both the contract interest rate and initial fee into account) declined from 6.84 to 6.43 percent on loans for land acquisition, from 7.95 to 6.61 percent on loans for land development, from 8.83 to 7.64 percent on loans for speculative single-family construction, and from 7.92 to 7.16 percent on loans for pre-sold single-family construction (Exhibit 12). This marks the third quarter in a row of declining effective rates on all four categories of loans.  Except for the spec construction loans,  the largest declines occurred between the fourth quarter of 2019 and first quarter of 2020.

NAHB Seeks White House Action on Soaring Lumber Prices

By Industry News

NAHB sent a letter to President Trump expressing the housing industry’s growing concern and seeking prompt action regarding soaring lumber prices and supply shortages that are harming the housing sector and the economy.

NAHB is urging the White House to play a constructive role to alleviate this growing threat to housing and the economy by calling on domestic lumber producers to ramp up production to ease growing shortages and making it a priority to work with Canada on a new softwood lumber agreement that would end tariffs averaging more than 20% on Canadian lumber shipments into the United States.

As the nation fights to rebound from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, housing has been a bright spot for the U.S. economy, particularly single-family construction, with permits running 3.4% higher during the first half of 2020 compared to the first half of 2019.

However, builders are seeing shortages of lumber resulting in an 80% increase in lumber prices since mid-April. Framing lumber prices reached a record high in late July, while oriented strand board prices have increased 138% over the past year. These sharp increases are unsustainable, particularly in light of the housing affordability crisis.

NAHB’s letter to the White House stressed that housing can do its part to create jobs and lead the economy forward; but in order to do so, we need to address skyrocketing lumber prices and chronic shortages.

NAHB recently sent a similar message to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Zoltan van Heyningen, executive director of the U.S. Lumber Coalition.

View NAHB’s letter to President Trump.

Amid Record Low Rates, Refinancing Flourishes

By Housing

Over the last two weeks, the Mortgage Bankers Association’s tracked 30-year fixed-rate mortgage average rate fell by 14 basis points to 3.06%, a new record low in the series. At the same time, the results from its Weekly Application Survey show both weekly and year-over-year percentage increases in purchasing and refinancing activities.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, purchasing activity increased by 2.0% from the previous week and by 26% compared to the same week last year, while refinancing showed a stronger weekly gain of 9.1% and a staggering year-over-year gain of 47%. Between refinancing and purchasing activities, the former accounted for 65.7% of all mortgage activity in terms of the number of applications, the highest share in over three months. Combined with low housing inventory, the movement of interest rates to record lows over the past couple of weeks and the slower pace of purchasing relative to refinancing are a testament to the current housing market being a seller’s market.

Government-backed mortgage activity also increased in the previous week: the FHA’s share of mortgage applications increased to 10.4% from 9.6% and the Veteran Administration’s (VA’s) share increased by 20 basis points to 11.4%. USDA (farm) applications remained unchanged at 0.6%.

How to Help the Future Green Building Workforce

By Industry News

This year’s Solar Decathlon Design Challenge was held virtually in the wake of COVID-19. Collegiate teams compete in categories such as mixed-use multifamily, urban single family and suburban single family; winning projects feature innovative designs for buildings that excel in affordability, efficiency and occupant health.

If you’re wondering how your company can get involved with this annual Department of Energy competition, consider participating as a mentor in the Design Partners program.

Your company could gain exposure by providing student teams with real-life experience working on buildings and homes with your clients. Whether you’re a seasoned high-performance builder or relatively new to the market, the Design Partners program allows you to mentor students and receive a zero-energy design — i.e., a building that produces as much energy as it consumes — for a new or existing building in your project portfolio.

The program requires a 20- to 30-hour commitment over the course of a year of in-person or remote consultation with the student team to discuss your design requirements and give them ongoing feedback leading up to the competition. There are also minimum parameters depending on the building type. For example, in the urban single-family housing division, the building must be between 300 and 2,500 square feet, and the lot size can be up to 5,000 square feet.

In return for completing the consultation hours and fulfilling basic design parameters, your company will:

  • Have the chance to mentor and work with students;
  • Establish relationships with the younger workforce and build your company’s exposure for potential future employees;
  • Receive a zero-energy design for a real project in your portfolio that you are already contracted to design and build; and
  • Receive a basic cost estimate for the building.

To see how other organizations have contributed and interacted with the Design Partners program, visit the Solar Decathlon’s project profiles page or see how other NAHB members have mentored previous winners. If you have a project in mind and are interested in participating, the Design Partner form is now available.

For more information about NAHB’s sustainable and green building programs, contact Program Manager Anna Stern. To stay current on the high-performance residential building sector with tips on water efficiency, energy efficiency, indoor air quality, and other building science strategies, follow NAHB’s Sustainability and Green Building team on Twitter.

Gain for the “Core” CPI in July

By Housing

In July, overall inflation remained unchanged from the previous month, while core inflation accelerated.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by 0.6% in July on a seasonally adjusted basis, the same increase as in June. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, “core” CPI rose by 0.6% in July, after an increase of 0.2% in June. It marked the largest monthly increase in the “core” CPI since January 1991. This monthly increase in the “core” CPI was caused by increases in multiple indexes. In July, the indexes for shelter (0.2%), communication (1.9%), used cars and trucks (2.3%), apparel (1.1%) and medical care (0.4%) all increased, while the index for recreation declined by 0.6%.

In July, the increase in energy prices was partially offset by the decrease in the food index. The price index for a broad set of energy sources rose by 2.5% in July, after an increase of 5.1% in June. The food index decreased by 0.4% in July, following a 0.6% increase in June. It was the first decrease since April 2019. The index for food at home decreased by 1.1% in July after an increase of 0.7% in June. Five of the six major grocery store food group indexes fell in July. The index for food away from home rose by 0.5% in July, the same increase as in June.

During the 2008 recession, steep declines in energy prices pulled overall inflation away from core inflation, widening the gap between overall and core inflation. Unlike the 2008 recession, significant declines in core inflation, along with decreases in energy prices, accounted for drops in overall inflation during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Overall and core inflation moved in the same direction over the past seven months.

During the past twelve months, on a not seasonally adjusted basis, the CPI rose by 1.0% in July, following a 0.6% increase in June. Meanwhile, the “core” CPI increased by 1.6% over the past twelve months, after a 1.2% increase in June. The food index rose by 4.1% and the energy index declined by 11.2% over the past twelve months.

BLS data collection in July was again affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. BLS mentioned in the today’s news release that many indexes are based on smaller amounts of collected prices than usual, and a small number of indexes that are normally published were not published this month.