Fannie, Freddie to Delay Mortgage Refinancing 0.5% Surcharge Until Dec. 1

By Industry News

After strong opposition from NAHB and many other housing, consumer advocacy, and banking groups, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) said today that it has ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to delay until Dec. 1, 2020, the implementation of a new 0.5% surcharge on mortgage refinances.

The government-backed mortgage guarantors on Aug. 13 announced they would charge an additional 0.5% fee on refinanced mortgages they purchase beginning Sept. 1 due to “market and economic uncertainty” caused by the pandemic and subsequent economic shutdowns.

NAHB joined with 19 other housing and banking organizations — including the American Bankers Association, Center for Responsible Lending, Mortgage Bankers Association and National Association of Realtors — to issue a strong statement opposing the move.

NAHB still believes this action was ill-conceived and could not come at a worse time. Housing has been keeping the economy afloat during the coronavirus pandemic, so it makes absolutely no sense for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase financing costs for mortgage borrowers during an economic crisis.

By some estimates, the 0.5% fee would amount to a $1,400 surcharge on the average loan Fannie and Freddie purchase.

Under the new structure announced by the FHFA today, refinance loans with balances below $125,000 will be exempt from the 0.5% fee.

NAHB thanks FHFA Director Mark Calabria and the administration for listening to concerns expressed over the past two weeks.

New Home Sales Surge in July

By Housing

New single-family home sales surged in July, as housing demand was supported by low interest rates, a renewed consumer focus on the importance of housing, and rising demand in lower-density markets like suburbs and exurbs.

Census and HUD estimated new home sales in July at a 901,000 seasonally adjusted annual pace, an approximate 14% gain over June and the strongest seasonally adjusted annual rate since the end of 2006. The April data (570,000 annualized pace) marks the low point of sales for the current recession. The April rate was 26% lower than the prior peak, pre-recession rate set in January.

The gains for new home sales are consistent with the NAHB/Wells Fargo HMI, which equaled a data series high in August, demonstrating that housing is the leading sector for the economy. Consider that despite double-digit unemployment, new home sales are estimated to be 8% higher for the first seven months of 2020 compared to the first seven months of 2019.

Sales-adjusted inventory levels declined again, falling to a just a 4 months’ supply in July, the lowest since 2013. This factor points to additional construction gains ahead. The count of completed, ready-to-occupy new homes is just 61,000 homes nationwide. Total inventory declined almost 9% year-over-year, with inventory down to 299,000.

Moreover, sales are increasingly coming from homes that have not started construction, with that count up 34% year-over-year. In contrast, sales of completed, ready-to-occupy homes are down almost 24%. These measures point to continued gains for single-family construction ahead.

Thus far in 2020, new home sales are higher in all regions. Sales on a year-to-date basis are 5% higher in the South, 9% in the West, 20% in the Midwest, and 22% higher in the Northeast.

Existing Home Sales Continue Record Rebound in July

By Housing

Boosted by historically low mortgage rates, existing home sales, as reported by the National Association of Realtors (NAR), posted another record increase in July and surpassed pre-pandemic levels.

Total existing home sales, including single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, soared 24.7% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.86 million in July, the largest monthly gain on record and the highest level since December 2006. On a year-over-year basis, sales were 8.7% higher than a year ago.

The first-time buyer share decreased to 34% in July from 35% last month, but is higher than a year ago (32%). However, price gains threaten this share in the future. The July inventory level fell to 1.5 million units from 1.54 million units in June and is down from 1.9 million units a year ago.

At the current sales rate, the July unsold inventory represents a 3.1-month supply, down from 3.9-month in June and 4.2-month a year ago. This low level supply of resale homes is good new for home construction.

Homes stayed on the market for an average of just 22 days in July, down from 24 days last month and 29 days a year ago. In July, 68% of homes sold were on the market for less than a month.

The July all-cash sales share was 16% of transactions, equal to last month but down from 19% a year ago.

Despite the recent fluctuation in sales, home prices remained strong. The July median sales price of all existing homes was $304,100, up 8.5% from a year ago, representing the 101st consecutive month of year-over-year increases. This is also the first time national median home price reached $300,000 level. The median existing condominium/co-op price of $270,100 in July was up 6.4% from a year ago.

Regionally, all four regions saw double-digit month-over-month gains for existing home sales in July, ranging from 19.4% in the South to 30.6% in the Northeast.  On a year-over-year basis, sales grew in the Midwest, South and the West (10.3%, 12.6% and 7.8% respectively), while sales declined 5.9% in the Northeast.

Though sales have picked up, rising home prices driven by low inventory and elevated jobless claims could be a bottleneck for future home sales. More listings and home construction are needed to meet this rising demand.

Housing Rebound: Year-over-Year Gains for June Single-Family Permits

By Housing

Over the first six months of 2020 – and after the onset of the impact of the coronavirus – total single-family permits issued year-to-date (YTD) nationwide reached 433,484. On a year-over-year (YoY) basis, this is an 3.8% increase over the June 2019 level of 417,453.

Year-to-date ending in June, single-family permits across the four regions ranging from an increase of 6.5% in the South to a decline of 1.7% in the Northeast. In multifamily permits, South reported a 3.1% increase while the other three regions reported declines – Northeast (-14.7%), Midwest (-6.2%), and West (-5.6%).

Between June 2019 YTD and June 2020 YTD, 34 states saw growth in single-family permits issued while 16 states and the District of Columbia registered a decline. South Dakota recorded the highest growth rate during this time at 36.7% from 1,178 to 1,610, while single-family permits in the District of Columbia declined by 50.0%, from 108 in 2019 to 54 in 2020. The 10 states issuing the highest number of single-family permits combined accounted for 61.8% of the total single-family permits issued.

Year-to-date, ending in June 2020, the total number of multifamily permits issued nationwide reached 224,918. This is 3.3% decline over the June 2019 level of 232,682.

Between June 2019 YTD and June 2020 YTD, 21 states and the District of Columbia recorded growth while 29 states recorded a decline in multifamily permits. North Dakota led the way with a sharp rise (449.0%) in multifamily permits from 98 to 538, while Michigan reported the largest decline of 55.1% from 3,117 to 1,401. The 10 states issuing the highest number of multifamily permits combined accounted for 64.3% of the multifamily permits issued.

At the local level, below are top 10 metro areas which issued the highest number of single-family permits. 
Metropolitan Statistical Area Single-family Permits: June (Units #YTD, NSA)
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX                                                                           20,614
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX                                                                           19,744
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ                                                                           13,561
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA                                                                           11,828
Austin-Round Rock, TX                                                                             9,526
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC                                                                             8,289
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL                                                                             7,770
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL                                                                             6,728
Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN                                                                             6,658
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV                                                                             6,458
For multifamily permits, below are the top 10 local areas which issued the highest number of permits:  
Metropolitan Statistical Area  Multifamily Permits: June (Units #YTD, NSA)
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA                                                                         18,079
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX                                                                         10,680
Austin-Round Rock, TX                                                                           9,526
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX                                                                           9,196
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL                                                                           8,893
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA                                                                           8,029
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ                                                                           7,807
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA                                                                           7,028
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI                                                                           5,706
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV                                                                           5,444

          
        

Q2 2020 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey

By Housing

The Federal Reserve’s latest release of the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey shows banks’ lending practices and households and businesses’ demand for various classes of loans as of the second quarter of 2020. As evidenced in the survey, in the wake of the COVID-19-wrought pandemic, widespread economic hardship caused many banks to tighten their standards across all credit classes of households and businesses. With these tightening standards also came the imposition of interest rate floors on financial products in Commercial & Industrialized lending. At the same time, businesses reported weaker demand for loans in the second quarter, not only when compared to the previous quarter but also when compared to second quarter of the prior year.

As shown above, as of the second quarter of this year, on net, 64% of banks held tighter standards for financing multifamily developments than banks which did not, and 81% of banks held tighter standards for financing construction and land development than those which did not. At the same time, an overwhelming positive net share of real estate businesses expressed less demand for those activities; on net, 58% of banks reported less demand for multifamily loans and nearly 60% of banks reported less demand for loans for construction and land development. These results are consistent with the general state of the U.S. economy reeling from the initial economic effects of the pandemic.

Unlike the demand for commercial real estate, the demand for residential real estate, i.e., single-family units, has shown strong growth. As interest rates reached record lows, pent-up demand for housing that had been latent in the first months of the pandemic in the United States, combined with severe supply constraints, created a perfect storm. The data show net shares of banks reporting increased demand over the last three months across various mortgage classes. Interestingly, the data also show slightly higher shares of banks reporting stronger demand for Qualifying Mortgage (QM) loans than non-QM loans. Qualifying Mortgages ensure that the borrower meets certain requirements.

NAHB, Housing, Consumer Advocacy and Banking Groups Oppose Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Action to Raise Refinancing Costs

By Industry News

In a move strongly opposed by NAHB, housing, consumer advocacy and banking groups, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac announced they will charge a 0.5% fee on refinance mortgages they purchase as of Sept. 1.

NAHB believes this action was ill-conceived and could not have come at a worse time. Housing has been keeping the economy afloat during the coronavirus pandemic, so it makes absolutely no sense for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase financing costs for mortgage borrowers during an economic crisis.

This move, approved by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), will hurt families trying to make ends meet in these challenging times and goes against President Trump’s recent executive action calling on federal agencies to do all they can to help renters and home owners to weather the economic effects of this pandemic.

Joint Statement in Opposition

NAHB joined with 19 other housing and banking organizations — including the American Bankers Association, Center for Responsible Lending, Mortgage Bankers Association and National Association of Realtors — to issue the following joint statement in opposition:

“Wednesday night’s surprise announcement by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the GSEs) conflicts with the Administration’s recent executive actions urging federal agencies to take all measures within their authority to support struggling homeowners. The additional 0.5% fee on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refinance mortgages will raise costs for families trying to make ends meet in these challenging times. In addition, the September 1 effective date means that thousands of borrowers who did not lock in their rates could face unanticipated cost increases just days from closing.

“In spite of the fragility of the national economic recovery, the mortgage market has been able to withstand many of the most severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recent refinance activity has not only helped homeowners lower their monthly payments, but it is also reducing risk to the GSEs and taxpayers. At a time when the Federal Reserve is purchasing $40 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities per month to help reduce the cost of buying or refinancing a home and stimulate the broader economy, this action by the GSEs raises those costs, contradicting and undermining Fed policy.

“The pricing increase is particularly harmful for our nation’s low- and moderate-income homeowners and for the emerging, but unsteady improvements to the national economy. The undersigned organizations strongly urge the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which had to approve this policy, to withdraw this ill-timed, misguided directive.”